The following great peripherals war is being waged over your ears. After every company on the planet put out a gaming mouse and after that a mechanical keyboard, now it’s time for headsets. So gaming headphone.
We realize you don’t desire to scroll through every headset review when all you need is an easy answer: “What’s the most effective gaming headset I can buy with my hard-earned dollars?” This page supports the answer you seek, no matter what your finances is.
We’ll keep updating our recommendations when we look at new products and find stronger contenders. With this latest update, we’ve reviewed a number of fancypants models, namely the Sennheiser Game Zero and and Sennheiser GSP 350, along with the Audio-Technica ATH-AG1X. For more earthly budgets, we’ve also tested the SteelSeries Arctis 7, the HyperX Cloud Revolver S, as well as the Logitech G533, which debuts as our new best mid-range wireless headset.
Kingston doesn’t have the identical pedigree within the headset space as its competitors, however the HyperX Cloud is really a winning device at the cheap price.
Our 2016 headset recommendation remains virtually just like our 2015 headset recommendation (and our 2014, as an example): The Kingston HyperX Cloud. Or, if you’re feeling somewhat fancier, the Cloud II. It’s comfortable, it sounds great, and (on top of that) it’s relatively inexpensive. What else could you want inside a headset?
True to its name, the HyperX Cloud is probably the most comfortable headsets in the marketplace. It’s hefty, having a solid-metal construction that belies its cheap price, but sits feather-light around the head. The faux-leather earpieces are generously padded, oversized, and form an effective seal without squeezing too much.
Plus it sounds excellent. As mentioned in your review, this isn’t a studio-quality group of headphones. It’s got the typical gaming-centric bass boost plus a slick high end, but both of them are subtle enough the HyperX Cloud competes favorably with laptop headphone twice its cost. There’s no Kingston-provided way to adjust the sound, considering the fact that the HyperX Cloud connects through standard 3.5mm jacks, but you honestly shouldn’t need to tweak it whatsoever out of your box. It appears pretty damn great.
Really the only negative thing is the microphone. It’s very flexible, which I appreciate, but has a propensity to pick up background noise and plosives while leaving your voice nasally and hollow.
The slightly-more-expensive HyperX Cloud II is, I think, more a lateral move than an improvement over its predecessor. It swaps the 3.5mm connection for any 7.1-ready USB soundcard with better in-line controls and some noise cancellation in the microphone, however you wouldn’t notice a huge distinction between the 2 iterations and I’m unsure the increase in cost is worth it.
Regardless, either model is a great option for a gaming headset. Within an increasingly crowded market, the HyperX Cloud nails pretty much every major category with few significant compromises. I am hoping another model improves on the microphone, but also for $80 it’s a steal.
The Cloud Stinger provides solid sound, serious comfort, and an attractive design for anyone who just wants a “good enough” headset without the wallet-shock.
HyperX’s Cloud headset is still the most popular, but the company undercut themselves a little bit by releasing the HyperX Cloud Stinger. Listed at $50, it’s one of many cheapest gaming headsets I’ve experienced from a reputable brand. And it’s good.
Sure, it’s not quite as great as the very first Cloud, but for most people the Stinger ought to do all right. The plastic chassis lacks several of the original Cloud’s panache and sturdiness, but looks high-end from the distance and sits pretty slim around the head. HyperX also solved the Cloud’s biggest issue and lastly put a volume slider straight at the base of your right earcup and gave it a flip-to-mute microphone, so no longer fiddling with in-line controls.
As for the audio, the Cloud Stinger’s got a good mid-range with virtually no distortion even at high volumes. The treble is underpowered and also the bass range is virtually nonexistent, but 80 % associated with a given game, film, or song can come through clear and clean.
If you have a significant headset, particularly the original Cloud, I wouldn’t repeat the Stinger is necessary-own. But if you’re looking for the best excellent value on entry-level hardware, this is certainly it. It’s an insane bargain when comparing it to many other headsets within the same price tier.
At only under $100, Corsair’s Void Wireless is mainly a good wireless headset, but you will encounter some compromises.
Frankly speaking, Corsair doesn’t genuinely have any competition in this particular category. Most decent wireless gaming headsets will run you $150 or maybe more. Corsair’s Void Wireless is priced in a mere $100, which leaves it on its lonesome.
But even making up that vacuum, it’s pretty decent. Not phenomenal, mind you, but around this price you’re acquiring a bargain.
I wasn’t really sure things to make of your Void’s weird, diamond-shaped ear cups but after some use I’m actually pretty pleased. The Void Wireless sits a lttle bit forward about the head, using the band resting just above your forehead. It will take some becoming accustomed to, but the end result is less tension in the jaw plus more on the rear of the pinnacle where it’s less noticeable. I wouldn’t say it’s as comfortable as being the more conventional HyperX Cloud, but undoubtedly I really like it more than its predecessor, the H2100.
The on-headset controls are fairly intuitive, by using a volume rocker on the bottom in the left ear, plus oversized buttons for power and mute on the side. And it’s got 16.8 million color RGB lighting, if that’s your bag.
The largest design issue is that the Void Wireless is heavy. It’s no problem when sitting up, but if you appear down or search for the headset has a tendency to slide around. I don’t know whether it’s because of the battery or maybe the metal-augmented construction, however your neck gets a workout using this headset.
Sound-wise, the Void Wireless still needs some work. It sounds passable, especially while gaming, but throwing on some music sets the Void Wireless’s limitations into stark relief. The reduced-end is muddy and distorted, along with the whole array of mid-to-high-end frequencies sounds slick, like you’ve applied a lot of compression.
You may adjust the headset’s sound in Corsair’s software, but Corsair’s application is still a little unwieldy. A lot better than last year, I believe, but nonetheless not comparable to Razer, SteelSeries, or Logitech. Also, some users have reported issues with firmware updates-not just a great sign.
“This doesn’t appear to be an incredibly positive review,” you could say. And you’re right, it’s not. The Void Wireless is not an incredible headset, as I said up top. But it is the most effective wireless gaming headset under $150, and given the amount of wires are affixed to my PC at virtually any moment, the benefit of cheap wireless could possibly be worth sacrificing a certain amount of sound quality.
Logitech’s G533 doesn’t have quite the same breadth of options as being the G933, but an even more restrained design and a bargain price turn this a solid contender for the best wireless headset.
It’s a tricky call replacing our former mid-tier wireless pick, the Logitech G933, using its sibling-successor the Logitech G533. Like, really tough. The G933 is a great headset, with crisp and well-balanced audio and a few nifty design features (like having the capacity to store the USB dongle inside an earcup).
But I’m still replacing it. Why? Well, aesthetics really are a huge reason. If you want a sign how Logitech’s design language has shifted in past times year or so, your search is over gam1ngheadset the G933 and G533. The G933 was all sharp angles and sci-fi. The G533 however is sleek, professional, restrained. By using a piano-black finish and soft curves, it looks like a headset created by Audio-Technica or Sennheiser or perhaps a more mainstream audio company-not really a “gaming” headset. I enjoy it.
The G533’s design is also functional. The microphone isn’t as hidden as I’d like, but that’s the only flaw. The headset is lightweight, durable, and much less vise-grip tight than its predecessor.
Regarding audio fidelity? It’s not quite similar to the G933, but the differences are minimal. The G533 lacks a little bit of oomph, especially at lower volumes, and its particular 7.1 support is subpar. Those are hardly reasons to step away, though-the majority of people will run the headset loud enough to counteract the headset’s absence of presence, and virtual 7.1 is (for me) just about always bad. The G533 is worse compared to average, although the average is still something I select to avoid day-to-day.
Regardless, the G933 continues to be being offered and it is an absolutely good option for many, especially if you want console support. The G533 is PC-only, as the G933 can be attached by 3.5mm cable to other devices. Of course, if you value comfort over audio fidelity, check out the SteelSeries Arctis 7 too-one more great choice.
Astro’s new A50 touts a new charging station and controls, but nonetheless doesn’t put the audio you might expect from the $300 set of headphones.
SteelSeries Siberia 800 Wireless Dolby 7.1 Gaming Headset
After a new generation of the game earphone and Siberia 800 released in 2016, I figured we may finally break the tie that’s dominated our splurge headset pick within the last several years.
But once again, there’s no clear winner at this $300 price-though Astro certainly made some strides toward edging out SteelSeries.
The latest A50’s biggest improvement is definitely the battery. The brand new model overcomes a long-running weak spot and packs in 12 to 15 hours of life-enough to get you through a good long day of gaming. Better yet, it features gyroscopes from the ears that give it time to detect whether you’ve set it down. It automatically shuts off ten seconds later in that case, after which turns back and connects to your PC on once you pick it back up. Its base station also serves as a charger, a good blend of function and sweetness.